X-Men @ The Odeon
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellan, Famke Janssen, Halle Berry, Anna Parquin.
Verdict: A move in the right direction for the Hollywood Comic Book movie.
After the dire 'Batman and Robin',
the comic book film was an unwanted customer in the
exclusive bar that is blockbuster filmmaking, but in a summer where the 'Saturday Night
at the movies' films hinge on big storms and stealing cars, anything goes. So we have X-Men,
perhaps the coolest and most popular of Marvel Comic's stable, swinging into town, in the
face of budget cuts, story changes and bad pre-showing publicity, bringing comic book capers
back to the silver screen. Its do or die time, this could be the final nail in the coffinand
re-birth of Lazarus proportions.
Which is it? Well neither really as X-Men is great but also fundamentally flawed. It does
boast a list of good points that many of the recent franchise movies have failed upon,
mainly that although it differs from the comic, its impossible on film not to, its still
for a dying genre or a re-invention undoubtedly within the spirit of it.
Concentrating on the persecution of mutant human beings
on Earth in the not too distant future, makes it darkly edged and natured, just like the
comic. Secondly the characters are spot on, particularly the guy everyone wants to be,
Wolverine, like the comic book the Canadian with the metal claws and the regenerative powers
is a perfect recreation by newcomer Jackman. Also what perfects him is the myth surrounding
him is finely preserved as well as the unpredictable psychotic tendencies making a perfect
tragic anti-hero. I WANT TO BE WOLVERINE, HE WAS JUST SOOOOOOOO COOL. Parquin plays the
stunning Rogue a teen coming to terms with her mutant ability with such fragile
venerability, it becomes encapsulating and very moving. The sets are lavish, the costumes
are great none of the spandex and codpiece nonsense of B & R and the supporting characters
are effortlessly cool.
Well picky as I am, and as you may come to notice I like films that make you think, doesn't
mean I don't like Blockbusters, but they have to that roar across the screen and have an
edge to them. X-Men has these elements, so why is this not one of the best films of the
year? Firstly there's not enough of the X-Men, the others Storm, Toad, Sabretooth, Cyclops,
Jean Grey and Mystique look the part but are criminally under used and for a true spectacle
characters like Archangel, Gambit and Banshee were needed. Also although the beginning
explanation was much needed, for those who didn't know the comic, and gave a great build up
to the film what came after was good while it lasted but did not last long enough. The
final action scene was great but MUCH MORE WAS NEEDED and the plot, Magneto turning all of
New York City into mutants was functional but not amazing.
The main problem was that it seemed to be a foundation for a sequel/trilogy/franchise, which
left too many questions unanswered and was, at the end of the day damn frustrating, I JUST
WANTED TOO SEE MORE, MORE ACTION, MORE CHARACTERS MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE. Hopefully we
will and director Bryan Singer (The Usual Suspects) will stay on board, has he has proved
he's a great visionary, BUT PLEASE FOX GIVE HIM MORE MONEY, THEN THE COMIC BOOK MOVIE WILL
BE THE BIG CONTENDER IT ONCE WAS.
Chris M
Send us your comments on this review
back to the top
back to the cool stuff directory
|
|